| |
Why Indian Americans Should Vote Republican
As
predictably as the days grow shorter, the leaves change color and
excited children return to school, every four years the fall
presidential election season saturates the airwaves with patriotic
fervor, well-rehearsed rhetoric, political punditry, and emotional
debate over issues of central importance to the lives of all citizens,
such as national security, taxes, the economy, and social policy. This
year, many Americans justifiably see the stakes as particularly high,
with our nation at war and headed by a president whose leadership has
polarized the electorate. But apart from the immediate issues that may
drive Americans to the polls in record numbers this November 2, this
election season provides a much-needed opportunity to reflect upon
deeper issues of political philosophy, the immigrant experience, and
the implications of this year's stark choice for Indian American voters
not just between George W. Bush and John F. Kerry, but between the
Republican and Democratic parties.
Before
sharing my views on this issue, I should make full disclosure that I am
a registered Republican, and have been so since I was first eligible to
vote. And even before I could vote, my parents were both registered and
active Republicans since the day they became naturalized U.S. citizens.
Like many of my first generation peers, I was taught that in America
you could study hard, work hard, behave yourself and ultimately achieve
success. Unlike the country we left behind, your name, gender, religion
or place of birth would not dictate the course of your life and
continue you to a narrow stratum of potential achievement. As I grew
older and began to face the challenges of life, I feared that things
were not quite as simple, but that the Republican Party better
reflected my understanding of the American Dream. And the party offers
the same promise to all immigrants, though only a minority of them seem
to be getting the message.
We
are a community of professionals, small-business owners, and high-tech
entrepreneurs. Like most immigrants, I work hard for the money I earn
and like to keep as much of it as possible and give as little as I can
legally justify to the government to squander on bloated bureaucracy
and social programs that just don't work. The Republican Party has
always been an advocate of lower taxes on all classes of society,
smaller government, less regulatory burdens on small businesses and the
promise of a rising economic tide that lifts all boats, not a zero-sum
game of class warfare such as that advocated by the Democrats.
In
his first term, President Bush eliminated the perverse marriage tax
penalty, repealed key death tax provisions and doubled the child care
tax credit. Thanks to these and other tax Republican policies, seven
out of every ten U.S. households – the highest proportion in history –
own their own homes. On the business-front, common sense and personal
experience tells us that an entrepreneur who pays lower taxes is likely
to invest the savings in his business, creating jobs and shareholder
value in an efficient manner. This year, one candidate – John Kerry –
promises to redistribute hard-earned dollar of the hard working people
to welfare recipients and bureaucrats; the other, George Bush,
champions an "ownership society" where citizens control their own destinies.
Free
trade and its subset, the political bogeyman of outsourcing, is yet
another example of a clear choice between the parties which points
emphatically in one direction. One candidate, John Kerry, openly
derides the trend of American industry, especially in the high tech and
services send lower-paying jobs abroad where they can be done more
efficiently and cheaply than in the highly regulated U.S. economy, in
part to our Byzantine tax code and de facto taxes in the form of
unbridled regulation and a runaway litigation system.
Who's the chief beneficiary of those "outsourced"
jobs - no, not Indian workers, although they may come in a close
second. The big winner in the outsourcing dynamic is the American
consumer, who pays less for goods and services that would otherwise
cost double or more if, as John Kerr wants, America puts economic
barriers at its borders to keep call-center and software development
jobs here at home.
Numerous other social and economic "hot button"
issues highlight the differences between the parties. Democrats want to
impose a nationalized healthcare system on us under the guise of equal
access, while Republicans correctly believe that the U.S. healthcare
system provides the best care in the world and that the healthcare
marketplace would operate even more efficiently if rid of the scourge
of runaway malpractice lawsuits such as those that made Kerry's running
mate John Edwards a multimillionaire trial lawyer.
Voting
Republican makes sense this fall for most Americans, but it is
especially so for the Indian American community when we consider some
pragmatic facts. For example, under the current Bush administration
more Indian Americans have been appointed to prestigious jobs in the
highest ranks of the federal government than in any prior
administration. This administration has held more high level meetings
with top Indian diplomats, has been more proactive on Indian-American
foreign policy issues, and has held more joint Indian and American
military exercises to strengthen strategic alliances ~between the two
countries than any prior administration in history. And as a civil
rights lawyer, I can personally attest to the fact that this
administration has heard and acted upon the civil rights concerns of
religious minorities such as Sikhs and Muslims, protecting their
employment rights and their rights to wear religious symbols in public
schools.
This
historical support by minority communities of the Democratic Party
fails to reflect a modern and pragmatic analysis of our community's
economic, social and geopolitical interests, and further fails to
adjust for the fact that all of these decades of support have failed to
pay off during Democratic administrations in any positions of power and
influence for Indian Americans. Rather than predictably voting for the
Democratic ticket this year, they should take the opportunity to
examine what the candidates stand for, and vote for the part that
better reflects our interests, values, and dreams.
Go Back to News
|
 |